What the Supreme Court Order on Stray Dogs Tells Us About Us as Human Beings
The Supreme Court's directive to relocate stray dogs exposes how public discourse…
Read more →Ecofeminism contends that patriarchal domination and environmental exploitation stem from identical systems of control, wherein both women and nature are commodified as inexhaustible resources. The movement insists ecological survival requires dismantling gendered hierarchies of power.
We call her Mother Nature. And then we treat her exactly as we would our mother. Be honest about it- what is our relationship with our mothers? We profess undying love for her. We talk about how much she sacrificed for us. Twice a year, on Mothers’ Day and her birthday, we post a photograph of her as a young woman and gather the likes and comments. We give her a hug when we are in the mood to and tell her how lucky we are to have her. But in reality, we take her for granted. We expect her to always be there for us. We trust that she will clean up our messes. We expect her to forgive us no matter what we do and put things right again. After all, isn’t that what mother are supposed to do?!
Our relationship with Mother Nature is no different. We treat Nature as a resource to be exploited. We claim to love her, but all we want is for her to keep giving, even if we don’t do enough to ensure her survival.
For centuries, there has been little difference between the forces of patriarchy which take women for granted and exploit their invisible labour, and the forces of capitalism which are responsible for the over exploitation of our natural resources. Society views both women and nature through the lens of domination- land was meant to be fenced, drilled and tamed, just like women’s bodies and labour were meant to be controlled and institutionalised. Even the language used by capitalistic/ colonial societies uses gender metaphors to describe land- explorers set out to find “virgin territories”, and settlers “exploit” the resources.
“It almost sets up the adversarial relationship that we see today in between people and the land, people and nature, that I think is at the root of many of our environmental ills.”
– Robin Wall Kimmerer1
Ecofeminism emerged to challenge this mindset. It argues that gender oppression and environmental destruction are not separate issues, but instead emerge from the same system of domination. At the heart of ecofeminism is the belief that patriarchal societies view both women and the natural world are viewed as passive, infinite resources to be owned, exploited and exhausted. Ecofeminism argues that it would be impossible to save the natural world without simultaneously dismantling patriarchal power.
The term “ecofeminism” was coined in 1974 by French feminist Françoise d’Eaubonne, who called upon women to lead an ecological revolution to save the planet from destruction. During the early days of ecofeminism (now called cultural ecofeminism), it was argued that women are naturally closer to the earth due to their biology and their role as nurturers. In time, however, this biological determination was rejected, and modern ecofeminism emphasizes that women are closer to nature because their socially mandated roles of caregiving, cooking and housekeeping makes leave them move vulnerable to environmental degradation. This social ecofeminism critiques capitalism and argues that market-driven economies exploit both the unpaid labour of women and natural resources for profit.
“Drawing on the insights of ecology, feminism, and socialism, ecofeminism’s basic premise is that the ideology which authorizes oppressions such as those based on race, class, gender, sexuality, physical abilities, and species is the same ideology which sanctions the oppression of nature.”
– Greta Gaard2
Today, as feminism takes a more intersectional approach and looks at how gender intersects with race, class and geography, ecofeminism also looks at how environmental degradation disproportionately affects women from marginalized communities and from developing countries. Ecofeminism, today, explicitly links gender justice with decolonialisation, anti-racism, anti-capitalism and Indigenous perspectives, and understands that the exploitation of natural resources relies on multiple, overlapping hierarchies of human oppression.
Ecofeminism rejects the view that the climate crisis can be fixed with technical interventions like carbon offsetting, geo-engineering or other market-based solutions. Instead, ecofeminism argues that true sustainability can only be achieved once society starts valuing the labour of women and the vitality of the natural world. Most of the prominent campaigns against the wanton destruction have all been lead by women from the marginalised communities who would be most affected by the destruction. Whether it is the women who hugged trees as a part of the Chipko Movement3 , the women who planted trees in Kenya as a part of the Green Belt4 Movement, or the women who challenged the dumping of toxic waste into the Love Canal5– each was rooted in care, reciprocity, and equality. These women resisted in order to protect their heritage, and their actions were rooted in an abiding love for the natural world.
Ecofeminism provides a vital lens for understanding modern global crises. It proves that environmental degradation is not just a technical problem, but a social justice issue. True ecological healing cannot happen without dismantling the systems of domination that oppress human beings. By advocating for a worldview based on care, reciprocity, and equality, ecofeminism offers a path toward a more sustainable and just future.
“We are either going to have a future where women lead the way to make peace with the Earth or we are not going to have a human future at all.”
– Vandana Shiva